The Complexities of Judicial Takings
نویسنده
چکیده
When (if ever) a judicial action can be an unconstitutional taking of private property has long been an open question in American constitutional law. Nested within this larger question are a host of detailed issues concerning both substance and procedure. Despite passing references in some cases, and a more direct discussion in one concurring opinion, the Supreme Court of the United States—until recently—had never squarely addressed the question of judicial takings or the detailed issues that a judicial takings doctrine would present.
منابع مشابه
The Economic Impacts of Eminent Domain
We model government takings of private property, embedding prominent theories of their economic consequences. Random assignment of U.S. judges and the fact that judges make takings precedent in a manner correlated with their race, political party, and prior government advocacy facilitate causal estimates of allowing government takings. Novel data on judicial biographies and takings decisions si...
متن کاملPalazzolo v. Rhode Island: A Few Clear Answers and Many New Questions
The U.S. Supreme Court’s latest regulatory takings decision, Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, is significant for its rejection of what I term the positive notice rule. It also confirms the narrow scope of the categorical rule, developed in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, for government actions that work complete takings of property. Beyond that, Palazzolo evokes the potential for the enhance...
متن کاملA novel dataset on horizontal property rights in 126 jurisdictions
The law and the economy are deeply influenced by horizontal property rights, which are the rules regulating legal direct and indirect takings between private parties. To foster research on the determinants and impact of these institutions, we illustrate here a novel data set partially employed in (Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe, Carmine Guerriero, 2015; Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe, Carmine Guerriero, Zh...
متن کاملProperty Takings in Developed versus Developing Countries: Economics, Politics, and the Limits of the Holdout Problem
Property takings are common in the developing world. For example, despite Chinese reforms in 2003 to protect property rights, Chinese governments forced thousands of families to relocate during the buildup to the Beijing Olympics. In recent years, governments in Peru, Venezuela, Bolivia, Zimbabwe, Russia, and others have nationalized heavy industry as well as specific firms. Large-scale land ta...
متن کاملRegulatory Takings , Public Use , and Just Compensation After Brown
This Article analyzes the potential impact on government regulation of private property rights of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington. That case upheld mandatory Interest on Lawyers’ Trust Accounts (IOLTA) programs. While Brown ensures continued funding for legal services for lowand moderate-income persons, it is difficult to reconcile with the Co...
متن کامل